Skip to main content
`Ctrl`+`K`
scipy.stats.

# wasserstein_distance_nd

scipy.stats.wasserstein_distance_nd(u_values, v_values, u_weights=None, v_weights=None)

  Compute the Wasserstein-1 distance between two N-D discrete distributions.

  The Wasserstein distance, also called the Earth mover’s distance or the optimal transport distance, is a similarity metric between two probability distributions [1]. In the discrete case, the Wasserstein distance can be understood as the cost of an optimal transport plan to convert one distribution into the other. The cost is calculated as the product of the amount of probability mass being moved and the distance it is being moved. A brief and intuitive introduction can be found at [2].

  Added in version 1.13.0.

  Parameters:
    u_values2d array_like

      A sample from a probability distribution or the support (set of all possible values) of a probability distribution. Each element along axis 0 is an observation or possible value, and axis 1 represents the dimensionality of the distribution; i.e., each row is a vector observation or possible value.

    v_values2d array_like

      A sample from or the support of a second distribution.

    u_weights, v_weights1d array_like, optional

      Weights or counts corresponding with the sample or probability masses corresponding with the support values. Sum of elements must be positive and finite. If unspecified, each value is assigned the same weight.

  Returns:
    distancefloat

      The computed distance between the distributions.

  See also

  `wasserstein_distance`

    Compute the Wasserstein-1 distance between two 1D discrete distributions.

  Notes

  Given two probability mass functions, \(u\) and \(v\), the first Wasserstein distance between the distributions using the Euclidean norm is:

  \[l_1 (u, v) = \inf_{\pi \in \Gamma (u, v)} \int \| x-y \|_2 \mathrm{d} \pi (x, y)\]

  where \(\Gamma (u, v)\) is the set of (probability) distributions on \(\mathbb{R}^n \times \mathbb{R}^n\) whose marginals are \(u\) and \(v\) on the first and second factors respectively. For a given value \(x\), \(u(x)\) gives the probability of \(u\) at position \(x\), and the same for \(v(x)\).

  This is also called the optimal transport problem or the Monge problem. Let the finite point sets \(\{x_i\}\) and \(\{y_j\}\) denote the support set of probability mass function \(u\) and \(v\) respectively. The Monge problem can be expressed as follows,

  Let \(\Gamma\) denote the transport plan, \(D\) denote the distance matrix and,

  \[\begin{split}x = \text{vec}(\Gamma) \\ c = \text{vec}(D) \\ b = \begin{bmatrix} u\\ v\\ \end{bmatrix}\end{split}\]

  The \(\text{vec}()\) function denotes the Vectorization function that transforms a matrix into a column vector by vertically stacking the columns of the matrix. The transport plan \(\Gamma\) is a matrix \([\gamma_{ij}]\) in which \(\gamma_{ij}\) is a positive value representing the amount of probability mass transported from \(u(x_i)\) to \(v(y_i)\). Summing over the rows of \(\Gamma\) should give the source distribution \(u\) : \(\sum_j \gamma_{ij} = u(x_i)\) holds for all \(i\) and summing over the columns of \(\Gamma\) should give the target distribution \(v\): \(\sum_i \gamma_{ij} = v(y_j)\) holds for all \(j\). The distance matrix \(D\) is a matrix \([d_{ij}]\), in which \(d_{ij} = d(x_i, y_j)\).

  Given \(\Gamma\), \(D\), \(b\), the Monge problem can be transformed into a linear programming problem by taking \(A x = b\) as constraints and \(z = c^T x\) as minimization target (sum of costs) , where matrix \(A\) has the form

  \[ \begin{align}\begin{aligned}\begin{array} {rrrr|rrrr|r|rrrr} 1 & 1 & \dots & 1 & 0 & 0 & \dots & 0 & \dots & 0 & 0 & \dots & 0 \cr 0 & 0 & \dots & 0 & 1 & 1 & \dots & 1 & \dots & 0 & 0 &\dots & 0 \cr \vdots & \vdots & \ddots & \vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \ddots & \vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \ddots & \vdots \cr 0 & 0 & \dots & 0 & 0 & 0 & \dots & 0 & \dots & 1 & 1 & \dots & 1 \cr \hline\\ 1 & 0 & \dots & 0 & 1 & 0 & \dots & \dots & \dots & 1 & 0 & \dots & 0 \cr 0 & 1 & \dots & 0 & 0 & 1 & \dots & \dots & \dots & 0 & 1 & \dots & 0 \cr \vdots & \vdots & \ddots & \vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \ddots & \vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \ddots & \vdots \cr 0 & 0 & \dots & 1 & 0 & 0 & \dots & 1 & \dots & 0 & 0 & \dots & 1 \end{array}\end{aligned}\end{align} \]

  By solving the dual form of the above linear programming problem (with solution \(y^*\)), the Wasserstein distance \(l_1 (u, v)\) can be computed as \(b^T y^*\).

  The above solution is inspired by Vincent Herrmann’s blog [3] . For a more thorough explanation, see [4] .

  The input distributions can be empirical, therefore coming from samples whose values are effectively inputs of the function, or they can be seen as generalized functions, in which case they are weighted sums of Dirac delta functions located at the specified values.

  References

  [1]

  “Wasserstein metric”, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wasserstein_metric

  [2]

  Lili Weng, “What is Wasserstein distance?”, Lil’log, https://lilianweng.github.io/posts/2017-08-20-gan/#what-is-wasserstein-distance.

  [3]

  Hermann, Vincent. “Wasserstein GAN and the Kantorovich-Rubinstein Duality”. https://vincentherrmann.github.io/blog/wasserstein/.

  [4]

  Peyré, Gabriel, and Marco Cuturi. “Computational optimal transport.” Center for Research in Economics and Statistics Working Papers 2017-86 (2017).

  Examples

  Compute the Wasserstein distance between two three-dimensional samples, each with two observations.

      >>> from scipy.stats import wasserstein_distance_nd
      >>> wasserstein_distance_nd([[0, 2, 3], [1, 2, 5]], [[3, 2, 3], [4, 2, 5]])
      3.0

  Compute the Wasserstein distance between two two-dimensional distributions with three and two weighted observations, respectively.

      >>> wasserstein_distance_nd([[0, 2.75], [2, 209.3], [0, 0]],
      ...                      [[0.2, 0.322], [4.5, 25.1808]],
      ...                      [0.4, 5.2, 0.114], [0.8, 1.5])
      174.15840245217169